https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/activity/Recent activity for TCNOpenenThu, 23 Apr 2026 11:27:56 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/477/MD TCP socket at listener side, timeout to close inactive socket ?Kari KeinanenThu, 23 Apr 2026 11:27:56 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/477/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2480/removed (outdated) TRDP test logs from trunkBenjamin SchererFri, 10 Apr 2026 09:45:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2480/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2479/#474 Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' data typeBenjamin SchererTue, 31 Mar 2026 08:31:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2479/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/448/?limit=25#a151I would consider the sc-32 handling in the spy as broken, or to the least not finished. Firstly, I just spent a day to find a reliable source how to calculate the sc-32 correctly. The standard has an example value for "123456789", which is wrong, as it relates to the AUTOSAR crc, which from what I understand, uses different data reflections ... I think. The testcase in tcnopen isn't any help either, as it is not checking against an expectation. Couldn't find any examples for Profisafe neither, and...ThorstenSun, 28 Dec 2025 20:03:09 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/448/?limit=25#a151https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/446/?limit=25#c468@John I cannot remember whether this was a bug that I fixed. Alternatively, did you accidentally set the dissector preference? You can choose between LE and BE interpretation, see screenshot 2. If this does not work as in the screen shots, you'll have to wait for the spy to respawn with the latest fixes in upstream-wireshark. It may be 4.7 or 4.8 ... And thanks for providing the attachments.ThorstenSun, 28 Dec 2025 19:14:19 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/446/?limit=25#c468https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/383/?limit=25#6bfbMD messages look better in the latest updates (once they go public). I think it might had an issue with packet reassembly.ThorstenSun, 28 Dec 2025 18:56:34 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/383/?limit=25#6bfbhttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/358/?limit=25#7898I believe this is fixed once the latest updates go upstream in wiresharkThorstenSun, 28 Dec 2025 18:53:46 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/358/?limit=25#7898https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/476/pdCallback() only propagates TRDP_NO_ERR and TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR; other TRDP error codes missingAditya KumarMon, 24 Nov 2025 13:23:45 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/476/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/475/Failure to update sequence counter if sequence counter is small but not zeroXavierWed, 05 Nov 2025 21:52:59 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/475/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/322/?limit=25#ba97/323aHi, I agree with Bryce Jensen. The current TCNOpen stack (3.0.0.0) doesn't work well with multiple ip addresses per interface.XavierWed, 05 Nov 2025 21:21:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/322/?limit=25#ba97/323ahttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/?limit=25#049b/fda9Thank you @ahweiss BTW, Do you know whether IEEE 802.1Qbv is still applicable to intra-consist networks?davidwangThu, 22 May 2025 05:58:45 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/?limit=25#049b/fda9https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/Remove compiler switch TSN_SUPPORT and related dead codeArmin-Hagen WeissWed, 21 May 2025 14:04:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/?limit=25#ccf9Hi @ahweiss Could you please clarify whether this means that all TSN-related components in the TRDP code are no longer in use, such as TSN PD and TRDP version 2? If this is the case, it would represent a major change. Will the TSN-related content in IEC 61375-2-3 Edition 2 also be entirely removed?davidwangTue, 20 May 2025 06:00:58 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/?limit=25#ccf9https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:47:06 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:26:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:25:08 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:23:21 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:20:19 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 08:16:33 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97We don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! The author of the ticket hasn't taken the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3 seconds for...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 07:49:15 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/Inconsistency for returned sequence counters after a timeoutArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 07:45:51 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97I don't agree with the change proposed in #463, and think that the current behaviour is correct! I think the author of the ticket hasn't considered the resultCode included as part of the PD callback into the consideration. If there a timeout for any PD subscriber, the callback with TRDP_TIMEOUT_ERR result code has the 'last received' sequence counter and 'last received' data. If I take different examples, considering that the successive rows happen chronologically after 1 second and timeout is 3...Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 08 May 2025 07:44:41 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/463/?limit=25#cb97https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/3.0.0.0.zip/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:37:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/3.0.0.0.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-18_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:36:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-18_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-033-11%20-%20TRDP%20Reference%20Manual%203.0.0.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:36:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-033-11 - TRDP Reference Manual 3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-032-12_-_TRDP_Conformance_Test_Report_v3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:36:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-032-12_-_TRDP_Conformance_Test_Report_v3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/1.4.2.0.zip/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:08:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/1.4.2.0.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-031-03%20-%20TRDP%20Conformance%20Test%20Specification.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:01:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-031-03 - TRDP Conformance Test Specification.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-13_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_1.4.2.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 08:00:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/1.4.2.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-13_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_1.4.2.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-032-12_-_TRDP_Conformance_Test_Report_v3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 07:53:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP2-D-BOM-032-12_-_TRDP_Conformance_Test_Report_v3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-18_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadTCNOpenFri, 25 Apr 2025 07:49:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/tcnopen/files/TRDP/3.0.0.0/TCN-TRDP4-D-BOM-030-18_-_TRDP_Release_Notes_3.0.0.0.pdf/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/Not all session parameters for PDs and MDs updated by tlc_configSession()Armin-Hagen WeissFri, 11 Apr 2025 08:44:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/Session parameters for PDs and MDs not updatedArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 11 Apr 2025 08:41:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/Receiving ECSP Status PD over multicast instead of unicastArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 11 Apr 2025 06:28:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/Regarding KEEP behaviour after PD TimeoutArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 11 Apr 2025 06:27:23 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/462/Incomplete check in vos_netIfUp for DSA switch attached interfacesArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 16:03:55 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/462/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/462/?limit=25#45ebImplemented like proposed, Test pending.Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 16:03:55 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/462/?limit=25#45ebhttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2478/#462 Incomplete check in vos_netIfUp for DSA switch attached interfacesArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 16:00:43 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2478/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/Session parameters for PDs and MDs not updatedArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 08:04:20 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2477/#466 Potential null pointere dereferenceArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 08:00:56 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2477/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/Potential null pointere dereferenceArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 07:55:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/?limit=25#f5c2No problem, thanks for Your contribution ! INow NULL pointer check of pNumJoinis done before valid session check.Armin-Hagen WeissThu, 10 Apr 2025 07:55:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/?limit=25#f5c2https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/?limit=25#714etlc_configSession() should be removed from the API. Session configuration should be done only once with tlc_open Session(),Armin-Hagen WeissWed, 09 Apr 2025 16:00:20 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/?limit=25#714ehttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2476/#464 Remove compiler switch TSN_SUPPORT and related dead codeArmin-Hagen WeissWed, 09 Apr 2025 15:36:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2476/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/Remove compiler switch TSN_SUPPORT and related dead codeArmin-Hagen WeissWed, 09 Apr 2025 15:33:11 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/464/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2475/#474 Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' data typeArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 08 Apr 2025 14:19:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2475/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851At network protocol level the type 16 char long TRDP_NET_LABEL_T was used due to the fact that in a earlier protocol version rhe lpavel at network level was not necessarily \0 terminated. Therefore at TRDP stack api level TRDP_LABEL_T was used which was 17 char long and included always \0 termination, Today the \0 termination of a label is also required at network level. Thus the code was changed now to use at api and network level only TRDP_LABEL_T containig 16 char including \0 termination.Armin-Hagen WeissTue, 08 Apr 2025 13:59:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/ Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' data typeArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 08 Apr 2025 13:40:57 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851At network protocol level the type TRDP_NET_LABEL_T is used which is 16 char long and might not be 0 terminated. In TRDP stack TRDP_LABEL_T is used which is 17 char long and always 0 terminated, I'll check if that can be changed in 61375-2-3 2nd edition.Armin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 09:54:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/ Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' Data Type causing issues with TRDP_DNS_REQUEST_T and TRDP_DNS_REPLY_TArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 09:51:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851At network protocol level the type TRDP_NET_LABEL_T is used which is 16 char long and might not be 0 terminated. In TRDP stack TRDP_LABEL_T is used which is 17 char long and always 0 terminated, I'll check if that can be changed in 61375-2-3 2nd edition.Armin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 09:51:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/?limit=25#b851https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/ Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' Data Type causing issues with TRDP_DNS_REQUEST_T and TRDP_DNS_REPLY_TArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 09:43:41 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/Size mismatch of VOS_IF_REC_T between source and header on LinuxArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 08:26:32 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/?limit=25#96c3Implemented like proposed.Armin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 08:26:32 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/?limit=25#96c3https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2474/#470 Size mismatch of VOS_IF_REC_T between source and header on LinuxArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 08:22:53 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2474/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2473/#470 Size mismatch of VOS_IF_REC_T between source and header on LinuxArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 08:16:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2473/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/DNR not working if DNS Server is different than TTDB ManagerArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 07:56:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/?limit=25#bb51Solved with #472Armin-Hagen WeissFri, 04 Apr 2025 07:56:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/?limit=25#bb51https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/472/Add option for a preconfigured ECSP addressArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 03 Apr 2025 11:14:27 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/472/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2472/#472 Add option for a preconfigured ECSP addressArmin-Hagen WeissThu, 03 Apr 2025 11:03:05 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2472/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/ Error in the implementation of 'LABEL' Data Type causing issues with TRDP_DNS_REQUEST_T and TRDP_DNS_REPLY_TMuntasir HossainTue, 01 Apr 2025 19:36:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/474/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/DNR not working if DNS Server is different than TTDB ManagerStefan PMon, 31 Mar 2025 06:23:43 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/473/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/472/Add option for a static ECSP addressArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 28 Mar 2025 09:23:41 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/472/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/Add TRDP option to forbid reusing ports/sockets for MD only Armin-Hagen WeissTue, 25 Mar 2025 10:19:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/?limit=25#580fTRDP_OPTION_T changed to UINT16 and new option TRDP_OPTION_NO_REUSE_MD_ADDR addedArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 25 Mar 2025 10:19:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/?limit=25#580fhttps://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2471/Version updatedArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 25 Mar 2025 10:13:27 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2471/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2470/#471 Add TRDP option to forbid reusing ports/sockets for only MD Armin-Hagen WeissTue, 25 Mar 2025 10:10:33 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2470/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/Add TRDP option to forbid reusing ports/sockets for only MDArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 25 Mar 2025 09:17:38 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/471/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/Size mismatch of VOS_IF_REC_T between source and header on linuxManuel BorelliWed, 29 Jan 2025 13:54:21 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/470/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2469/SDTv2 original release 2.4.0.1Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 12:15:34 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2469/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2468/SDTv2 code to be replaced by original one from SDTv2 release 2.4.0.1Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 12:13:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2468/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2467/SDTv2 source code replaced by the original one from SDTv2 release 2.4.0.1Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 12:07:16 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2467/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2466/Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 11:59:09 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2466/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2465/SDTv2 Release 2.4.0.1Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 11:28:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2465/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2464/Armin-Hagen WeissMon, 16 Dec 2024 11:25:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2464/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/?limit=25#e827Committed code change in r2463Chirag KhanganiSat, 14 Dec 2024 05:36:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/?limit=25#e827https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/?limit=25#5ea0Committed code change in r2462Chirag KhanganiSat, 14 Dec 2024 05:36:37 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/?limit=25#5ea0https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2463/#468 Regarding KEEP behaviour after PD TimeoutChirag KhanganiSat, 14 Dec 2024 05:32:12 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2463/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2462/#469 Receiving ECSP Status PD over multicast instead of unicastChirag KhanganiTue, 26 Nov 2024 06:41:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2462/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/425/SDTv2 Wrong Latency Monitoring in case of SDT_ERR_LOSS (and others)Armin-Hagen WeissTue, 19 Nov 2024 12:29:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/425/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/426/Wrong self acknowledgment of LTM after TrxsafeArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 19 Nov 2024 12:27:16 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/426/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/460/Multiple validator with same SMIsArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 19 Nov 2024 12:26:15 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/460/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/SDTv2: Format of User Data Version parameterArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 19 Nov 2024 12:24:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/SDTv2: Format of User Data Version parameterArmin-Hagen WeissTue, 19 Nov 2024 12:24:18 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/Regarding KEEP behaviour after PD TimeoutArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 15 Nov 2024 08:47:19 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/Receiving ECSP Status PD over multicast instead of unicastArmin-Hagen WeissFri, 15 Nov 2024 08:46:27 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/Receiving ECSP Status PD over multicast instead of unicastChirag KhanganiTue, 05 Nov 2024 12:49:39 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/469/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/Regarding KEEP behaviour after PD TimeoutChirag KhanganiTue, 05 Nov 2024 10:51:33 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/468/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/?limit=25#de98Hi. We also faced this issue, here is a patch proposal. Best regards, -Kari-Kari KeinanenWed, 30 Oct 2024 10:53:41 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/438/?limit=25#de98https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/Session parameters for PDs and MDs not updatedLorenzo BuzziWed, 16 Oct 2024 13:16:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/467/https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/?limit=25#d836Maybe I assigned this ticket to the wrong milestone. In such case I apologize and please change the assignment to the right value.Lorenzo BuzziWed, 16 Oct 2024 13:01:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/tickets/466/?limit=25#d836