https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/activity/Recent activity for Junicode fontenThu, 16 Mar 2023 14:44:51 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/?limit=25#ad6fThat’s cool, should I create another ticket over there?Johannes Schütz Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:44:51 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/?limit=25#ad6fhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/?limit=25#ab56The version of Junicode hosted here is no longer being updated. I'll be glad to include these new characters in Junicode 2, hosted on GitHub.Peter BakerThu, 16 Mar 2023 13:38:13 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/?limit=25#ab56https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/cyrillic small letter soft / hard sign: U+044C / U+044AJohannes Schütz Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:06:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/71/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/70/Some more Record charactersJaycee CarterWed, 02 Mar 2022 18:42:31 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/70/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/69/?limit=25#9d32Bold and Bold Italic have always had fewer glyphs. One of the goals of Junicode v. 2, being developed at Github, is that all faces should have the same set of glyphs. Look for a release sometime in 2022.Peter BakerMon, 29 Nov 2021 04:26:39 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/69/?limit=25#9d32https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/69/More glyphs for bold and bold italic!Mai Lê Bảo KhangMon, 29 Nov 2021 01:34:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/69/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/68/?limit=25#52eeThe line spacing settings in the font were revised (somewhere along the line) to conform with current best practices. The difference in your case probably comes from the typoLineGap setting, which was 512 and is now 900. You can download version 0.7.6 from this site: if it was serving your needs before, there's no reason not to use it now. Or you can grab the current version, 1.002, at https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New/tree/master/legacy and use a tool like ttx to change the line spacing yourself....Peter BakerFri, 06 Aug 2021 17:03:16 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/68/?limit=25#52eehttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/68/QuestionGraham Boyd PatersonThu, 15 Jul 2021 14:22:23 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/68/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/67/Scribal abbreviation: how?Robin WalkerThu, 20 Aug 2020 11:11:58 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/67/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#5517There is a major revision to Junicode underway at https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New, and most new features will be included in that version rather than the version hosted here. The new version is not ready for prime time, but I have added a "legacy" folder there, where I will leave bug fixes and minor enhancments to Junicode (especially to the bold and bold italic faces, which because of their relatively small size are easier to work with than regular and italic. The changes to bold italic...Peter BakerFri, 24 Apr 2020 22:54:09 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#5517https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#0fd0I don't know how I missed this issue when it first came up. Your diagnosis is right, though there are further complications having to do with Unicode normalization. All this will be fixed in the major remake of Junicode currently underway at https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New, under the name JuniusX.Peter BakerFri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:19 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#0fd0https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#d21aI will include this in the new version of Junicode (currently called JuniusX) at https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New. I will include a few changes the legacy version of Junicode hosted here, but this version is not actively under development.Peter BakerFri, 24 Apr 2020 22:35:06 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#d21ahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#fb4bSince I'm working with diplomatically transcribed medieval manuscripts in German in my thesis, stuff like vͤ (v with e superscript) or uͦ (u with o superscript) appear frequently, and these aren't present in the bold italic style. For the time being I'm using \stackrel to manually align the missing superscripts. This doesn't look perfect (superscripts are too low and slightly off to the left), but it works. I'd be glad if native combining superscript letters were added sometime.CarstenThu, 23 Apr 2020 11:58:36 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#fb4bhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/?limit=25#ae03Thank you!Enrique JThu, 23 Apr 2020 07:06:55 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/?limit=25#ae03https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/?limit=25#9f19I'll add this, though adding things to Junicode is not so easy just now. It will at least appear in the remade version currently under development: https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-NewPeter BakerWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:53:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/?limit=25#9f19https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/50/?limit=25#f786It never occurred to me to provide this feature, but it makes sense. I'll look into it.Peter BakerWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:50:31 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/50/?limit=25#f786https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#02d6/3bceYes, exactly. It's a very interesting letter shape.CarstenWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:48:18 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#02d6/3bcehttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#02d6You mean this? Interesting. I'm not sure if it's possible to add new things to MUFI at this point, so it would have to sneak in some other way--perhaps as a historical ligature.Peter BakerWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:46:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/?limit=25#02d6https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/Ligature of round d and eCarstenWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:34:41 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/66/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/50/Access to precomposed accented metrical symbolsCarstenWed, 22 Apr 2020 19:25:09 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/50/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/Small Caps for H with Breve BelowEnrique JTue, 07 Apr 2020 12:39:28 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/65/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/40/?limit=25#ab03I would also love to see this feature implemented in a future release. This variant on the ‘1’ character would be extremely useful for legal documents in which a ‘I’ looking number is not acceptable.ienisseiSat, 15 Feb 2020 19:33:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/40/?limit=25#ab03https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/64/?limit=250#0f4eI hacked these characters into the font using fontforge, but I didn't do bold or italic, and I don't know fontforge well enough to know how to submit a patch. The modified ttf and woff files are available at: https://antisol.org/Junicode-tolkien.ttf and https://antisol.org/Junicode-tolkien.woff Feel free to incorporate these glyphs or to give me some tips on how I can export them to a more useful format for you :)AntiSolWed, 12 Feb 2020 08:43:55 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/64/?limit=250#0f4ehttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/64/Support for 16F1 - 16F3 (Tolkien characters added in unicode v7)AntiSolWed, 12 Feb 2020 07:21:28 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/64/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492After further investigation, I suspect this is because there is already a ligature defined for some combinations with two combining marks. For example, there is a ligature at U+022B, which is "o uni0308 uni0304". So maybe this ligature is substituted first, and it lacks an anchor for additional marks?luciusSun, 02 Feb 2020 17:39:33 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492After further investigation, I suspect this is because there is already a ligature defined for some combinations with two marks. For example, there is a ligature at U+022B, which is "o uni0308 uni0304". So maybe this ligature is substituted first, and it lacks an anchor for additional marks?luciusSun, 02 Feb 2020 17:28:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492After further investigation, I suspect this is because there is already a ligature defined for some combinations with two marks? For example, there is a ligature at U+022B, which is "o uni0308 uni0304". So maybe this ligature is substituted first, and it lacks an anchor for additional marks?luciusSun, 02 Feb 2020 17:28:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/?limit=25#9492https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/Some combinations of three combining diacritical marksluciusSun, 02 Feb 2020 13:58:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/49/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/63/Support for U+1AB7 and U+1AB8 (German dialectology)luciusSun, 02 Feb 2020 13:06:59 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/63/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/62/Provide punctus elevatus at U+2E4EAndrew DunningFri, 15 Nov 2019 07:09:42 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/62/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/44/?limit=25#b347Given that there is now a proper punctus elevatus at U+2E4E, this should not be necessary.Andrew DunningFri, 15 Nov 2019 07:05:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/44/?limit=25#b347https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=25#13a7Thanks--this is a help.Peter BakerSun, 20 Oct 2019 13:53:45 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=25#13a7https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=50#a114I would prefer a (slightly smaller) version of the upper hook ꜣ U+A723 in your font. Otherwise ʾ U+02BE or ͗ U+0357 might serve the purpose.Daniel WerningSun, 20 Oct 2019 11:20:09 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=50#a114https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=25#ca60This looks like a thing worth doing. My go-to sources for Unicode don't have a lot of data for these characters. Do you know if this "glottal hook" is in the standard as a combining mark? E.g. a variant form of 0133 "Combining comma above"?Peter BakerSun, 20 Oct 2019 10:58:57 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/?limit=25#ca60https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/Latin letters glottal I/A/U: U+A7BA-U+A7BFDaniel WerningSun, 20 Oct 2019 09:12:16 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/61/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/Cyrillic glyphsPeter BakerSat, 19 Oct 2019 18:34:11 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/?limit=25#58f7This is not a bug.Peter BakerSat, 19 Oct 2019 18:34:11 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/?limit=25#58f7https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/Cyrillic glyphsSteven HoxvilleSat, 19 Oct 2019 18:09:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/48/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/47/Please enable HTTPS for junicode.sourceforge.io<REDACTED>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:56:20 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/47/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/46/?limit=25#f9e6Got to confess that I haven't been keeping up with developments in XeTeX/LuaTeX. I created that config file for the microtype package back when it was beta: I have no idea whether the same package will work with LuaTeX, or if the format of the config file has changed. I no longer package for the TeX world. The packaging requirements have gotten fiddly enough that I don't care to mess with them. If anyone else wants to take care of packaging for TeX, along with any associated config files, feel f...Peter BakerFri, 19 Jul 2019 20:26:07 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/46/?limit=25#f9e6https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/46/Junicode with LuaLaTeXHerbert VossSat, 13 Jul 2019 10:17:42 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/46/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/a4fb6b40/?limit=25#9d2cI don't think the current version would pass muster technically. Google fonts have very exacting requirements, including a development process that Junicode can't follow, if only because it's been around since the 90s. I'm working on a significantly reworked version that might qualify. It's on Github: https://github.com/psb1558/Junicode-New No releases yet, but you can see what I have in mind from the README. Development is very active, but the scale of the project means that it's going to be a while...Peter BakerThu, 30 May 2019 15:33:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/a4fb6b40/?limit=25#9d2chttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/a4fb6b40/?limit=25#b5ddI would love these to be on Google Fonts; they load so quick on any browser; and g Fonts allows you to select what subset of a font you needPushka BenThu, 30 May 2019 13:58:21 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/a4fb6b40/?limit=25#b5ddhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/45/?limit=25#0654Addendum: this is with XeLaTeX.Tae Lim KookFri, 05 Apr 2019 08:34:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/45/?limit=25#0654https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/45/Wrong positioning of diacritic on θTae Lim KookFri, 05 Apr 2019 08:33:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/45/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/60/?limit=25#6518I'm going to do this, but it's a big job in a font this size, and it's going to have to happen in the context of a wider revision: filling out the character set in the bold faces and changing the workflow to speed the process along. For the current version of the font, I'm only going to fix broken things.Peter BakerSat, 30 Mar 2019 13:33:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/60/?limit=25#6518https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/60/Italic and bold-iItalic small caps Ángel BerenguerThu, 28 Mar 2019 20:41:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/60/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#f03cI mean I'll remove the OpenType lookup, not the hwair itself!Peter BakerSat, 09 Mar 2019 20:26:10 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#f03chttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/?limit=25#6123Probably I was looking at different fonts handling it in different ways. I'll put this on my to-do list.Peter BakerSat, 09 Mar 2019 20:24:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/?limit=25#6123https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#b0ecI see. Very well, thank you very much!Kasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 20:19:06 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#b0echttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#7e1cWell, that is very weird. I have no idea why I put that ligature in dlig. There should be no ligature for hwair at all, in my (present) judgment. I'll remove it.Peter BakerSat, 09 Mar 2019 20:16:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#7e1chttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#aecaAlternatively, if appropriate, the general typographic ligatures (such as ct, st, tr, and tt) could perhaps be moved out of dlig and into another ligature (or feature) class?Kasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 19:50:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#aecahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#aecaAlternatively, if appropriate, the general typographic ligatures (such as ct, st, tr, and tt) could perhaps be moved out of dlig and into another ligature (or another feature) category?Kasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 19:50:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=100#aecahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#d1faThat's great news. Looking forward to the bug fix. Thanks for the quick response!Elias SugarmanSat, 09 Mar 2019 19:01:58 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#d1fahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/?limit=100#ad21I can confirm there does seem to be an inconsistency here between ḃ, ḋ, ḣ, and k̇.Kasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 16:33:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/?limit=100#ad21https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#8a95Alternatively, if OpenType permits it, it could perhaps remain in dlig, but be switched off via a stylistic set?Kasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 15:20:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/?limit=25#8a95https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/Moving the ƕ hwair ligature from dlig into another featureKasper SundströmSat, 09 Mar 2019 15:11:46 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/59/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#9892I've only figured out how to set up longs properly since the last Junicode release. I'm overdue for a bug fix release, so will include this feature. I'm traveling now, won't be able to do a new release for five days or so. But when it's fixed, your settings (historical forms + contextual alternates) will handle it correctly.Peter BakerFri, 08 Mar 2019 13:10:07 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#9892https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#9097I am trying to typeset documents with long Ses (hist) and dlig ligatures. The ligatures are fine, but the long S is replacing all Ses, not just the ones inside or starting words as it should. Here are my font settings: \setmainfont{Junicode}[ Script = Latin, Language = English, Ligatures = {Rare}, Contextuals = {Alternate}, Style = {Historic}, StylisticSet = 18 ] Is it something wrong with my system (Windows 10, TeX Live/XeLaTeX, VS Code), do I just not know how to use LaTeX, or did I just misunderstand...Elias SugarmanFri, 08 Mar 2019 01:36:28 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534857/thread/2c1b6f875a/?limit=25#9097https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/?limit=100#0523Thanks for the explanaition.PanderMon, 11 Feb 2019 12:47:32 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/?limit=100#0523https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/?limit=25#d3b8The condensed isn't mine, and unfortunately whoever is responsible for that fork didn't sign it, so that it's hard to tell whom to ask for an update. Further, it appears to me that the "Condensed" was made by simply scaling all glyphs horizontally, which is not the way to make a condensed face. Making an echt condensed face containing 3000+ glyphs is not a thing I want to undertake. I've got other projects that I'd rather be working on. I will point out, however, that: 1.) Junicode is Open Source,...Peter BakerMon, 11 Feb 2019 10:50:50 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/?limit=25#d3b8https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/Condensed versionPanderSun, 10 Feb 2019 13:16:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/7/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/44/onum broken for BoldItalicAnte 62Sat, 12 Jan 2019 10:36:58 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/44/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#b242Many thanks! I found the ROMAN SEXTULA SIGN in the Medieval Unicode Font, which is also similar but not the same. Now I understand the concepts of character and glyph and will keep the Junicode font attached above. Best wishes, RocíoRocioTue, 18 Dec 2018 23:40:31 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#b242https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#b3beI suggest that you visit the Medieval Unicode Font Initiative page (https://folk.uib.no/hnooh/mufi/) and cast your eye over the fonts linked to there. But I'll also point out that the philosophy of Junicode is not to reproduce the exact form of any character: manuscripts and early printed books are way too diverse for that. Rather, Junicode tries to provide as generic a glyph as possible to represent the character, whihch may have been in use for a thousand years or more (for the distinction between...Peter BakerMon, 17 Dec 2018 15:59:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#b3behttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#9004Hi, I m about to publish a printed edition of book in Spanish (printed in Venice around 1530). I would be very grateful if you could help me find a font to represent the abbreviation for con- on the word contento in the following line (highlighted in the attachment): "y de alli yr a dar cuenta a mi padre y hazer que sea contento que yo vaya otra vez en españa". The three forms in one of the attachments represent the abbreviation con-, com-, co-, cou-, cu (as found in a book of palaeography). The...RocioSun, 16 Dec 2018 11:22:14 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/discussion/534856/thread/351b277a2d/?limit=25#9004https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/?limit=25#93a6Those are all intended to formalize characters already in MUFI, just in case it wasn't clear (I was involved with the proposal for the punctus elevatus, 2E4E).Andrew DunningSat, 29 Sep 2018 02:34:20 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/?limit=25#93a6https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/Inconsistent dot above (ḃṗ vs. ḋ)Seán Ó SéaghdhaSun, 23 Sep 2018 15:42:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/58/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/?limit=25#f2c72E4D isn't in General Punctuation but rather Supplemental Punctuation, and it isn't in MUFI either. Too new, I guess. There are five new "Historic Punctuation" characters in Unicode, 2E4A-2E4E. I'll add them.Peter BakerTue, 11 Sep 2018 19:10:29 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/?limit=25#f2c7https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/2E4D - paragraphus markSabina NedeliusTue, 11 Sep 2018 13:41:58 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/57/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#3b61A great many things are missing in the bold faces. I simply don't have the time to generate the thousands of glyphs needed to match the bold with the regular and italic. Instead, I add to the bold faces in response to user demand. So I would ask if you need these things for your work (in which case I will add them), or are simply reporting an observation.Peter BakerThu, 05 Jul 2018 16:59:45 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/?limit=25#3b61https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/Glyphs (and ligatures) missing in bold versionsDaniel WerningWed, 04 Jul 2018 13:10:08 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/43/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/6/?limit=25#b369Glad you like the font. If you navigate to the "junicode-1.002" folder (as opposed to clicking the default download button), you'll see a woff version. For EOT and SVG, if you go to FontSquirrel's "Webfont Generator" page (https://www.fontsquirrel.com/tools/webfont-generator) and choose expert mode, you'll see that that online tool will happily create them for you, and also subset the font to optimize it for your website.Peter BakerTue, 26 Jun 2018 20:56:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/6/?limit=25#b369https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/6/eot, woff2, svg filesDaniel WerningTue, 26 Jun 2018 12:52:13 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/support-requests/6/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/junicode/ci/11e9572aad4d3953cd895fa36acf58273bb3c56a/metrics bugfix; version updatePeter BakerTue, 26 Jun 2018 10:04:46 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/junicode/ci/11e9572aad4d3953cd895fa36acf58273bb3c56a/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/?limit=25#3ff0/a555Thank you again; it works perfectly now.Holger H. BekemeierTue, 26 Jun 2018 07:45:10 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/?limit=25#3ff0/a555https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#3dc8Thanks Peter - I can confirm that it works on Word for Mac 16.14, and also Word for iOS.Peter HurstMon, 25 Jun 2018 23:32:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#3dc8https://sourceforge.nethttps%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/junicode-woff-1.002.zip/downloadJunicode fontMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:47:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/junicode-woff-1.002.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttps%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/README/downloadJunicode fontMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:47:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/README/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttps%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/junicode-1.002.zip/downloadJunicode fontMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:47:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/projects/junicode/files/junicode/junicode-1.002/junicode-1.002.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/55/Missing 1EDB (ẽ) char in Italic Bold face.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:44:15 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/55/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/55/?limit=25#537fThis character added in bold and bold italic. A new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:43:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/55/?limit=25#537fhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/Script typesPeter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:43:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#64easigma added in regular and italic faces. The new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:42:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#64eahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/LATIN SMALL LIGATURE LONG S H should be on U+EBA1Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:41:39 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/?limit=25#9d55This is fixed, and a new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:41:23 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/42/?limit=25#9d55https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#9d8aThis is fixed, and a new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:40:40 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#9d8ahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/Word for Mac v16.13 doesn't display Junicode correctlyPeter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:40:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#7641This is fixed, and a new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:40:05 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/41/?limit=25#7641https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/40/Another incorrect combining mark positionPeter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:39:20 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/40/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/40/?limit=25#db9dThis is fixed, and a new version will be posted momentarily.Peter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 19:38:53 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/bugs/40/?limit=25#db9dhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/junicode/ci/70c3f2e6022fd3a0c75b23da0ed41fab556b71b2/Added 1EBD where missing, sigma in r and i; corrected EBA1 where necessaryPeter BakerMon, 25 Jun 2018 13:24:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/junicode/ci/70c3f2e6022fd3a0c75b23da0ed41fab556b71b2/https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#61e7/a871Yes, thank you. And thanks for the discussion. El 22 jun 2018, a las 17:56, Peter Baker psb1558@users.sourceforge.net escribió: Using a sigma is an okay solution. The current version of Junicode (1.001) doesn't have one. Would it help if I added it? [feature-requests:#56] https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/ Script types Status: open Group: Next_Release_(example) Created: Wed Jun 20, 2018 07:20 AM UTC by Victor Millet Last Updated: Fri Jun 22, 2018 02:36 PM UTC Owner: Peter Baker...Victor MilletFri, 22 Jun 2018 16:05:08 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#61e7/a871https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#61e7Using a sigma is an okay solution. The current version of Junicode (1.001) doesn't have one. Would it help if I added it?Peter BakerFri, 22 Jun 2018 15:56:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#61e7https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#d671/071bI do agree that it seems a sigma; actually, at Innsbruck University, where they’re working on a complete, very accurate TEI-transcription of the whole codex, using Junicode (which, by the way, is simply excellent!), they use sigma here, as they told me. And we do have a secretary hand here, as we know the scribe of this literary manuscript to be a secretary of the Austrian emperor Maximilian. I’m not satisfied with the sigma (Greek letters are rare), but I admit that maybe it is the best solution....Victor MilletFri, 22 Jun 2018 15:09:28 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#d671/071bhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#d671Now to my eye, this looks like the sigma-shaped s that often appears in word-final position in gothic cursive, and becomes standard in that position in secretary hand. See e.g. "gentes" in about the middle of this image: The question is how to design this for a roman font. You could possibly get away with using MUFI F128 LATIN SMALL LETTER S CLOSED FORM, if you're not already using it elsewhere, or I could add something more sigma-like. Another question would be whether and how to encode it. The...Peter BakerFri, 22 Jun 2018 14:36:10 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#d671https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#dd8e/25daOf course: take for example image 29 / fol. 6 recto, column a, lines 18–26 (second paragraph, marked with red initial E): line 18: was (end of the line) line 19: es (3rd word) line 20: las (1st word) line 22: tichtens (3rd word) line 24: vleiss (1st word) + was (1st word) I chose this paragraph, because here this type of s appear much more frequently than in other parts of the same column. This type of s mostly in final position. Interesting is also Column b, line 15, first word: liess, with long...Victor MilletFri, 22 Jun 2018 14:03:19 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#dd8e/25dahttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#dd8eBeautiful MS, elegant hand. I can see right away the long s, and also the round s used in word-final position. Can you point me to an example of the letter-shape you're talking about? Image number, column, line, and quote the word?Peter BakerFri, 22 Jun 2018 13:39:47 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#dd8ehttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#6a6d/915dThanks for your answer: I understand your skepticism with the cursive. I didn’t mean that I would need a cursive letter in the sense that it fluently connects with other letters. I was referring to the SHAPE of the letter (https://goo.gl/images/WFxQNX https://goo.gl/images/WFxQNX). I thought that, in the same way there are other letters with different shapes (like +A75B "Latin small letter r rotunda”), an ’s’ with a shape of the one used in cursive handwriting, even if it is not cursive, could be...Victor MilletFri, 22 Jun 2018 13:10:17 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#6a6d/915dhttps://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#6a6dThe next question is why a cursive s should appear in a roman font. The way I see it, this is the round s adapted for a context in which it must be attached fore and aft, and that context doesn't exist in Junicode--which I do not want to take in the direction of embedding a cursive style. On the other hand, if there's a semantic as opposed to a stylistic distinction here, I could work on that, but I'd need to know more about the source and what you're doing with it.Peter BakerFri, 22 Jun 2018 12:01:12 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/junicode/feature-requests/56/?limit=25#6a6d