https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/activity/Recent activity for DialectenFri, 14 Apr 2023 19:37:17 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60in case someone would be still interested, after playing a day with debugger I think that this serious bug now is solved. In order to have a correct evaluation tokAnd and tokOr need to start/end new sub-expressions, so in DialectInterp.cpp you have to remove management from FirstRelational() and SecondRelational() putting this in _Expression(): case tokAnd: ++m_Token; if (! result->Boolean()) return true; // shortcircuit and if (!_Expression(&temp)) return false; *result = *result && temp; return...sbettiniFri, 14 Apr 2023 19:37:17 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60in case someone would be still interested, after playing a day with debugger I think that this serious bug now is solved. In order to have a correct evaluation tokAnd and tokOr need to start/end new sub-expressions, so in DialectInterp.cpp you have to remove management from FirstRelational() and SecondRelational() putting this in _Expression(): case tokAnd: ++m_Token; if (! result->Boolean()){ // shortcircuit and *result = false; return true; } if (!_Expression(&temp)) return false; *result = *result...sbettiniFri, 14 Apr 2023 17:37:27 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60in case someone would be still interested, after playing a day with debugger I think that this serious bug now is solved. In order to have a correct evaluation tokAnd and tokOr need to start/end new sub-expressions, so in DialectInterp.cpp you have to remove management from FirstRelational() and SecondRelational() putting this in _Expression(): case tokAnd: ++m_Token; if (!_Expression(&temp)) return false; *result = *result && temp; return true; case tokOr: ++m_Token; if (!_Expression(&temp)) return...sbettiniFri, 14 Apr 2023 16:55:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/4065e9c17a/?limit=25#dc60https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#33e2/5de0I can perfectly understand George, thanks. What a shame be not completely self-sufficient to keep going this wonderful product. I learned C++ playing with your very brilliant source, and was (and still is!) a challenge and a joy. Many thanks again for your work StefanosbettiniFri, 07 Apr 2023 23:59:36 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#33e2/5de0https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/6bc9ea0012/?limit=25#5b66Probably posting on TICKET section was not a good idea.... if 1 = 2 and 2 = 3 print true else print false endif --->true (BUG) if (1 = 2) and (2 = 3) print true else print false endif --->false (CORRECT) Unfortunately seem to be a major problem at parser level (_Expression() and descendant tree functions) not so simple to manage, at least for me. The parens workaround is a little annoing and break the elegance of the syntax, could someone check with some old version (pre 1.16) if the problem was...sbettiniFri, 07 Apr 2023 23:43:22 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/6bc9ea0012/?limit=25#5b66https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/bugs/8/BUG in parsing boolean expressions (if, while....)sbettiniFri, 07 Apr 2023 23:36:55 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/bugs/8/https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#33e2Hey Stefano! Sorry for my very late reply. I only just saw this. It has been many, many years since I've looked at this code. I love the threading idea, but I couldn't even begin to make reasonable suggestions without spending a good deal of time refreshing my memory. Cheers... GeorgeGeorge HarthWed, 13 May 2020 20:28:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#33e2https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#7df1I'm still working on this beautiful software, implementing some of less developed area. Now I would like to work on threading, and I wonder what was the original idea behind the partial work on cvalue. Being the stack and the token pointer unique inside the interpreter a simple statement "do_async" that run the interpret in a new thread could not be enough, I think that the threaded code must have at least his own copy of the current stack... Maybe a complete copy of the current CDialectInterp instance?...sbettiniMon, 15 Apr 2019 16:07:32 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/d1a295c7cb/?limit=25#7df1https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d061Unbelievable: I was expecting to be the last one in the world to use Dialect... In...MilvilleThu, 19 Feb 2015 14:04:29 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d061https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d8b5Guilect GUI Editor and Sample Source http://www.mediafire.com/download/fph712tls09p3qw/Guilect16.zip...Mr.NonObservantWed, 18 Feb 2015 16:59:29 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d8b5https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d8b5Guilect GUI Editor and Sample Source http://www.mediafire.com/download/fph712tls09p3qw/Guilect16.zip...Mr.NonObservantWed, 18 Feb 2015 16:58:46 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137830/thread/805ff0d3/?limit=25#d8b5https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/b24ca2d8/?limit=25#47a0I got GUILECT and a bunch of source examples for dialect from Guillect himself I...Mr.NonObservantWed, 18 Feb 2015 16:49:48 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/dialect/discussion/137829/thread/b24ca2d8/?limit=25#47a0